Open-source payment gateways: benefits, drawbacks & alternatives

Open-source payment gateways are often the go-to choice for many startups and small businesses. The promise of downloading source code, spinning up a self-hosted system, and tailoring it to support custom flows, region-specific payment methods, or niche use cases is undeniably attractive.
While open-source gateways offer flexibility and low entry costs, beneath the surface, they can pose serious challenges — from compliance gaps to scaling bottlenecks and ongoing maintenance headaches.
This guide breaks down how open-source payment systems work, highlights key projects, and explores alternatives for scaling businesses.
An open-source payment gateway is software with publicly available source code that allows businesses to process digital transactions, including credit card payments, digital wallets, bank transfers, and other forms of payment.
Unlike proprietary or SaaS-based solutions, open-source payment platforms allow developers to access and modify the software, then deploy it within their own infrastructure. They serve as the bridge between the merchant and payment processors, encrypting sensitive data and securely routing it to the acquiring bank for authorisation.
Most open-source payment systems are built and maintained by communities or foundations. While they offer significant freedom in theory, they also place full responsibility for compliance, security, and maintenance on the business.
Several projects are considered the best open-source software for a payment gateway, each with a different focus area. Some aim to provide complete open-source payment systems with billing or wallet management, while others are libraries or middleware that developers can extend into a working payment platform.
Below are some of the most widely recognised options:
Name | Key features | Main drawback |
---|---|---|
Apache Fineract | Banking platform, wallet storage, loan management, extensible APIs | Primarily a core banking solution, not a dedicated payment gateway; requires heavy customisation |
Kill Bill | Billing and subscription management, payment orchestration plugins, and extensibility | Complex initial setup, limited out-of-the-box PSP integrations |
Active Merchant | Ruby-based library for integrating multiple payment processors | Requires developer expertise; not a turnkey system |
Payara | Open-source Java platform with enterprise extensions, cloud-ready | Not payment-specific; better suited as middleware for developers |
Flutterwave OSS tools | Plugins for open-source payments, regional connectivity in Africa | Limited global reach; primarily a complement to proprietary services |
While these solutions provide functional building blocks, none of them are ready-to-use, PCI-compliant payment gateways out of the box. They serve as valuable starting points for developers, but most are not designed as full-scale, business-ready payment solutions.
While they aren't always business-ready, open-source payment systems offer meaningful benefits, particularly for small-scale projects, developers, and experimental use cases.
Real-world use cases 📚
The appeal of open source fades once you consider the real-world demands of running payment infrastructure. Here are the major pitfalls:
While the code is free, deploying a production-grade open-source payment platform requires:
These hidden costs often surpass SaaS subscription fees.
Handling sensitive customer data means strict compliance with PCI DSS, PSD2, and GDPR. Open source software does not come with built-in fraud prevention or compliance guarantees. Businesses must additionally hire security auditors, implement encryption and tokenisation mechanisms, and regularly patch vulnerabilities.
For many, compliance requirements outweigh the apparent cost savings, as a single failure can result in heavy fines and reputational damage.
Open-source payment solutions are rarely optimised for high transaction volumes. Large enterprises processing thousands of payments per second face severe bottlenecks without deep system re-engineering.
Unlike SaaS providers that offer 24/7 support, open-source projects often rely on community forums and sporadic documentation updates. If something breaks in your open-source payment orchestration flow, support may be limited to community forums and documentation – a significant gap compared to vendor-backed SLAs.
Most open source payment systems lack pre-built integrations with popular PSPs, wallets, and banking APIs. Businesses must build and maintain these connectors themselves.
Best practices if you still want to use open-source for payments 📚
Both approaches aim to facilitate secure payment processing, but they differ drastically in cost structure, compliance responsibilities, scalability, and long-term sustainability.
Let’s break down the key differences side by side:
Criteria | Open-source payment gateway | SaaS payment platform |
---|---|---|
Cost | Free software, but high hidden costs (development, compliance, servers, audits) | Predictable subscription fees, usually cheaper long-term |
Compliance (PCI, PSD2) | DIY responsibility, businesses manage certification themselves | Built-in compliance, provider certified |
Security | Internal team must implement and monitor security | Provider-managed monitoring, regular updates |
Scalability | Limited, requires custom engineering | Enterprise-grade scalability out of the box |
Integrations | Limited or no pre-built integrations | Dozens to hundreds of ready-made PSP and wallet integrations |
Support | Community-driven, inconsistent | Dedicated vendor support with defined SLAs |
Speed of deployment | Long deployment cycles (weeks to months) | Rapid deployment (go live in days) |
Open source suits experimentation and small-scale projects. For growing businesses, SaaS solutions typically provide greater security, faster time to market, and lower total cost of ownership.
Despite its drawbacks, there are scenarios where an open payment gateway makes sense:
For revenue-generating businesses, the challenges usually outweigh the benefits, making SaaS platforms a more secure, scalable, and cost-effective choice.
Although payment gateways offer flexibility, they also shift the burden of compliance, security, and maintenance onto your business. That's why many growing companies turn to payment orchestration platforms and white-label payment gateway providers, like Corefy, that combine the freedom of customisation with enterprise-grade reliability.
Corefy delivers all the benefits of open source – customisation, integration flexibility, multi-provider routing – without the burdens of constant patching, costly audits, or building integrations from scratch.
Here's what you get by opting for Corefy:
By choosing Corefy, you gain the freedom to grow securely and efficiently, while reducing costs on development, compliance, and infrastructure, which open-source gateways often require.
Open-source payment gateways seem attractive – they're free, flexible, and useful for learning. However, the challenges of compliance, security, scalability, and hidden costs make them unsuitable for growing businesses.
For startups experimenting with prototypes, open-source options may serve as a stepping stone. But for companies handling real customer payments, SaaS-based and white-label payment platforms like Corefy are the stronger long-term choice. They provide security, compliance, scalability, and support – critical factors for success in the highly regulated payment industry.
Not out of the box. Businesses must implement encryption and tokenisation, and undergo expensive PCI DSS audits themselves. Most open source payment platforms are not pre-certified.
As businesses grow, they need reliability, scalability, and compliance guarantees. SaaS solutions provide ready-made integrations, 24/7 support, and certified compliance, making them more cost-effective and secure in the long run.
An open-source payment gateway is a free software where you manage everything – hosting, compliance, and support. Meanwhile, a white-label model means you use a provider’s infrastructure branded as your own. It includes PCI compliance, integrations, support, and scalability, letting you focus on business growth instead of technical maintenance.
Usually not by default. Adding Apple Pay, Google Pay, or local wallets requires significant development and certification, which can be time-consuming and costly.
If the community stops maintaining it, you’re left with outdated, insecure code. Your only option is to fork the project and maintain it internally, which adds even more long-term costs.
Some can be extended to do so, but most lack built-in support. Multi-currency processing, FX conversion, and regional regulations usually require specialised PSP integrations.
Only if your needs are minimal and you already have an in-house technical team. For most growing businesses, hidden costs (compliance, support, integrations) make open-source more expensive than SaaS or white-label alternatives over time.