Imagine your customer trying to pay for your goods or services. He or she enters all the necessary data on the payment page, then sees the message “transaction declined”. What is the most expected reaction? If your product or service is really important or quite rare, the customer might try again. But usually, he or she will switch to one of your competitors and buy there. Sure, the expected behaviour depends on the reasons for the decline or even on a user’s mood. But it is advisable to take all possible steps to minimise the likelihood of declines. In this article, we cover some key takeaways on factors that can influence the gateway success rates.
Why are payments declined?
Declines might happen at several points of the payment process and for a range of reasons. The good news is that in most cases, they are preventable. Certainly, sometimes they require some actions on the user’s side and sometimes on yours. Now let’s drill down on
Lack of funds
A very vivid scenario — a customer wants to use a paid service but has no money on the chosen payment method balance. As practice shows, this is the reason for about 40% of declined transactions. At first glance, the way out is simple — the user has to refill the balance and then retry to complete the purchase. And you can do nothing with it on your side. But there’s more to this than meets the eye. Keep in mind that a customer may not want to refill the balance at that moment. Or may just change his or her mind and decide not to complete the purchase respectively. As far as it may lead to revenue losses, it’s not only your customers’ concern but yours as well. Here’s what can be done.
- Case 1. The user is known and has already made payments on your website. Such a situation is perfect to work with loyalty. Your company has a chance to show appreciation to your repeat purchasers’. The further steps depend on the type of services or products you sell. For instance, after the response from the payment processor about the lack of funds, you might thank that user for being with your company and inform him or her that this unsuccessful purchase is a gift.
- Case 2. The user is unknown and has never made payments on your website. Offering an alternative payment option for the user would be a perfect solution. Let the user try opting for other payment systems or online lending services (for example, services of online microloans directly to the card).
- Case 3. The user is known but has never made payments on your website. Some processing centres offer a delayed purchase option, i.e. they make several attempts to charge off money from the user’s account with a predefined frequency. It means a user gets the product or service, but his account is charged later. You may explicitly inform the user to refill the account within a certain period. Or you can even develop your own credit system, but this is fraught with overhead costs for the implementation of your own system of anti-fraud filters, blacklist users, as well as a scoring system.
In this case, the user should contact the issuing bank and solve the issue with their assistance.
The most tricky category for it includes a range of decline cases (sometimes quite strange ones). Anti-fraud filters are usually a kind of companies’ know-how (payment gateways’ as well). It is almost impossible to get a clear description of the reasons for transaction declines. Sometimes the reasons might even be absent. Still, the most popular reasons for anti-fraud declines are unusual locations of payments or unusual activity in general.
What can be done? If the user and his or her payment reputation are known to you (no precedents for chargeback before), try to address your processing centre and request to provide this user with the opportunity to pay, despite the identified threat. In other cases, segregate and consider each type of error separately and decide based on the frequency and amounts of rejected transactions. Anyway, you will have to assume full responsibility for potential losses and possible risks.
Merchant account s**ettings**
This category includes all declined transactions that were not processed because they encountered the restrictions indicated in the contract with your payment processor. It can be the min/max amount of transactions for one purchase, max amount of transactions per day or per month, geographic restrictions, and/or restrictions on the type of payment system. If you suspect one of these aspects to be the reason for a decline, try reconsidering the agreement.
Many treat such declines as errors caused by users’. Not so fast. This category includes all obstacles that mislead users or unclearly convey the essence of the target action, illogically thought-out scenarios of interaction, and texts that can be interpreted ambiguously. So, this includes UI/UX and copyright errors as well.
- Notifications. If payment was declined due to the lack of money, the text “Insufficient amount to make a purchase. Please, choose another payment method or top up your account” looks more friendly than “Payment declined”.
- Buttons. A user clicks on the “Pay” button on your website and gets redirected to a payment page on a new tab to fill in the payment details — the implied action and the real one do not correspond. The target action is “Go to payment”.
- Payment details. Implement recurring payments on your site. The system will remember the favourite payment methods, payment data, etc., of customers who often pay on your website.
This category might be considered the most controversial. On the one hand, you can’t influence the declines that occurred on the gateway’s side. On the other, you can execute a thorough search before choosing a gateway for your business. The declines in this category comprise all planned and unscheduled maintenance, system or partner servers uptime (by the way, do you know where they are hosted?). Consider subscribing to the hosting news digest: the information there might be useful.
Do you know how much does downtime of your payment processor cost you? In fact, this equals the sum passing through a gateway you use per minute (obviously, it will differ at times). So, the best solution for large projects is to include a failover partner for processing your transactions. To decide if you need an additional gateway and get armed against possible issues, take a look at the numbers of your current gateway downtime in accepting payments (for instance, you may consider the last month).
At Corefy, we empower your business with a feature-rich toolkit to accept payments and make payouts hassle-freely. Our platform meets the highest stability standards and is designed for maximum uptime to minimise possible risks while processing your transactions. Contact us to make your payment flows frictionless and your customers’ shopping experience smooth.